Which of the following is recommended as a reviewer for a pull request?

Having at least one project peer as a reviewer for a pull request is highly beneficial for several reasons. Project peers are familiar with the codebase, the team's coding standards, and best practices. They can provide valuable feedback based on their understanding of the project's architecture and design, ensuring that the new code integrates seamlessly with existing functionalities. This collaborative review process also fosters knowledge sharing and encourages adherence to coding conventions among team members.

While other roles, such as project managers, client representatives, and technical writers, hold significant importance within a project, they may not possess the same level of technical insight regarding code and development practices. Project managers may focus on timelines and deliverables, client representatives might concentrate on business needs and requirements, and technical writers typically handle documentation rather than code review. Hence, involving project peers is the most effective way to maintain code quality and ensure that all contributions align with project goals.