Which advantage best describes Git's ability to handle large projects?

Git's ability to handle the data integrity of large projects is a key advantage due to its underlying architecture and design principles. Git is a distributed version control system, which means that every developer has a complete local copy of the entire repository, including the full history of changes. This architecture ensures that data integrity is maintained at all levels, even for large projects.

When working on large codebases, Git effectively manages the history of all changes made, allowing for robust tracking and auditing of alterations over time. Its advanced features, such as hashing mechanisms with SHA-1, provide a high level of assurance that the data has not been corrupted or tampered with. This integrity is vital for large projects where numerous contributors are making changes, and maintaining a reliable history is essential for collaboration and understanding the evolution of the codebase.

The other choices highlight aspects that do not accurately represent Git's strengths in the context of large projects. For instance, supporting smaller team sizes does not directly influence its use for larger projects; rather, Git can facilitate coordination among large teams effectively. Suggesting that Git is only necessary for small codebases misrepresents its capabilities, as it is explicitly designed to scale efficiently for any size. Moreover, while requiring fewer resources to operate might be a